Problem DiagnosticDescribe it · get the method combination

Don't pick a framework. Describe the problem.

Tell it what you're facing and a little about the engagement. It reads the problem, classifies it, and recommends one methodology — or a sequenced combination — across the engagement, marking where AI accelerates, where your judgement holds, and the one decision that needs a human signature. The frameworks are the easy part; knowing which to reach for is the craft.

START HERE The problem, in your own words

Forget frameworks. Just describe what's actually going on — the messier and more honest, the better the read.

— or add the client's own document —

Drop an RFP, scoping email or pricing request here

or click to choose · PDF, Word (.docx) or text · born-digital, not scanned

⚠ Client documents may carry names, commercials or confidential detail. Extracted text stays in your browser and is only sent on when you press Analyse — handle it per your data policy (treat as Amber/Red).

A little about the engagement — context changes how the methods sequence, not just which ones

The problem description is enough to start; the context sharpens the fit.
The Augmentation Line™ Where AI runs. Where humans sign.
AI autonomoushigh-volume, rule-based, reversible
AI-assisteddrafted by machine, owned by a person
Human authoritygates, waivers, sign-off, accountability

In an engagement, the Line runs through the diagnosis: the model reads the brief, maps the methodologies and drafts the sequence — and the engagement lead owns the frame, the gates and the advice the client acts on. Your weakest areas are almost always Line problems — authority parked in the wrong zone.

A practitioner reference. The live, fillable templates remain under Working templates; a named human signs off every decision.