Triage
Every requisition used to land in a queue for a buyer to read. Now it lands in the right channel, coded, with the reason written on it, before anyone touches it.
The machine holdsReads each requisition at creation, applies the category's channel rules, proposes the catalogue or contract item, builds the approval flow and writes why. Ambiguous cases route up, never down.
A named human signsThe budget owner approves; the requester confirms a substitution; the buyer decides an exception.
The receiptRule fired, channel proposed, coverage evidence, approvers added and why. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverMaverick spend and buyer hours
Runs on: Ariba Guided Buying, Ariba Buying requisitions, S/4HANA purchase requisition
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Purchase requisitions, Purchasing policies) · NetSuite (Purchase Requests, approval routing) · Oracle Fusion (Self Service Procurement requisitions, approval rules) · Workday (Requisitions, Business process approvals)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
£150m indirect spend, 20% off-contract, 5% price gap on that spend: £750,000 a year recovered if half is routed to contract. Plus 2 buyer FTE freed from PR-to-PO conversion.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: Up to 16% of negotiated savings are lost to maverick buying (Suplari, 2026); contract leakage runs 5 to 15% of contracted spend, best in class under 3% (usedatabrain, 2026).
Guided BuyingcatalogueP-cardcontracted PO
MatchDesk
The invoice arrives matched or with its discrepancy named and the evidence attached. The payment proposal arrives with every changed bank detail marked. Nobody pays on the agent's say-so.
One process, two halves. MatchDesk is the CPO's half (purchase-to-pay matching); The Invoice Gate is the CFO's half (payables control and the payment proposal). One build, one return, and the £540,000 is counted once in every bundle.
The machine holdsCaptures every invoice from the network, PO flip, self-billing or OCR; matches within tolerance; routes each query to its owner with evidence; reconciles card statements; drafts the payment proposal with anomalies marked.
A named human signsAP approves out-of-tolerance and non-PO invoices; a named person releases the run under dual authorisation; bank changes confirmed by call-back and a second person.
The receiptInvoice id, match result and tolerance, evidence, owner routed to, anomaly flags. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverCost per invoice and fraud exposure
Runs on: SAP Business Network invoices, S/4HANA supplier invoice, F110 payment proposal
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Invoice matching, Product receipts) · NetSuite (Vendor Bills, Item Receipts) · Oracle Fusion (Payables invoice matching, Receiving) · Workday (Supplier invoices, Receipts)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
120,000 invoices a year from £7.50 to £3.00 each: £540,000 a year, plus the duplicate and diversion losses that never post.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: Average cost per invoice $9.40, best in class $2.78 (Ardent Partners, 2025); APQC best in class $2.36 versus $10.89 for the rest (2025).
PO invoicenon-POcardpayment rundynamic discounting
RenewalRadar
No contract auto-renews unseen. Ninety days out, the owner gets a brief: spend history, benchmark, the clause the date came from.
One contract read, two halves. RenewalRadar is the CPO's half (the renewal decision and the notice); The Commitment Ledger is the CFO's half (accruals, escalators, the forecast). One read of the register serves both; a client pays for the read once.
The machine holdsWatches expiry, notice windows, auto-renewal clauses and consumption against target value across the portfolio; delivers the renegotiation brief.
A named human signsThe contract owner signs renew, renegotiate or terminate; Legal signs changed clauses.
The receiptContract id, clause read, spend history, benchmark used. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverUnwanted auto-renewals and missed renegotiation
Runs on: Ariba Contract Workspace and Contract Terms, S/4HANA purchase contracts and scheduling agreements
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Purchase agreements) · NetSuite (Purchase Contracts) · Oracle Fusion (Procurement Contracts) · Workday (Supplier Contracts)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
400 contracts, 5% renewing unseen, average £120k, 8% renegotiation gain: £190,000 a year, and one avoided lock-in pays for the agent.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: 3 to 8% of contracts auto-renew a year on unfavourable terms when nobody tracks them; mid-market firms report an average $2.3m a year lost to unwanted auto-renewals (usedatabrain, 2026).
Strategiccontracted POframeworkcatalogue
SavingsLedger
One savings number the CFO actually believes, because every initiative is followed from award to contract to invoice and reconciled to the ledger.
The machine holdsTracks each initiative from forecast to contract to invoice, reconciles claimed savings to the general ledger, drafts the benefits report.
A named human signsThe CPO signs the realised-savings figure to the CFO and board.
The receiptInitiative id, baseline source, contract price source, invoice lines reconciled, gap explained. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverCredibility of the savings number and the CPO's mandate
Runs on: Ariba sourcing awards and contract terms, S/4HANA purchase order and invoice prices, journal entries
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Ledger, Budget vs actual) · NetSuite (Financial Reports, Purchase history) · Oracle Fusion (General Ledger, Procurement analytics) · Workday (Financial Reporting, Spend analytics)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
A £6m savings claim that reconciles at 85% instead of the 60% the CFO assumed is £1.5m of budget the function is credited with. The mandate is the return.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: Savings leakage between claim and ledger is the reason CFOs discount procurement savings; 16% of negotiated savings lost to maverick buying is the visible part (Suplari, 2026).
Strategiccontracted POframeworkcatalogue
GateCheck
Supplier onboarding that chases itself. The file arrives complete; a named officer signs activation; bank details never pass through the agent.
The machine holdsRuns registry, sanctions, credit, insurance and certification checks, chases documents, assembles the onboarding file, creates the supplier in blocked status through a communication arrangement with no bank entity.
A named human signsA named procurement officer signs activation and every waived check; bank details under dual control after call-back.
The receiptChecks run with source, documents received, open items, who signed activation. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverOnboarding lead time and payment-diversion risk
Runs on: Ariba SLP questionnaires, Supplier Risk, S/4HANA business partner
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Vendor onboarding, Vendor collaboration) · NetSuite (Vendor Records, Vendor onboarding) · Oracle Fusion (Supplier Qualification Management, Supplier Portal) · Workday (Supplier onboarding)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
1,200 new suppliers a year, 3 hours saved each and onboarding from four weeks to five days: 3,600 hours and the first-order delays that stall projects. One prevented diversion is the year's return.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: Automation-led supplier onboarding reduces time and cost by up to 60% (apexanalytix); onboarding forms shrink from forty fields to eight once the public record is verified automatically (StoryC clean-data point of view).
All buying channels; payment run and dynamic discounting
SpendLens
Every invoice line classified, every month, with a confidence on each. Category managers get their Mondays back.
The machine holdsClassifies all transaction and invoice lines to the taxonomy monthly, flags unclassified and misrouted spend to a steward queue.
A named human signsThe CPO signs taxonomy and baseline changes.
The receiptLines classified, confidence distribution, unclassified share. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverCategory manager time and strategy quality
Runs on: Ariba Operational and Analytical Reporting, S/4HANA supplier invoice and journal entries
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Procurement analytics, Vendor invoice lines) · NetSuite (SuiteAnalytics spend, Vendor Bills) · Oracle Fusion (Procurement analytics, Spend Classification) · Workday (Prism spend analytics, Supplier Accounts)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
Eight category managers at half a day a week on data: 200 days a year returned to sourcing, worth £1m of sourcing events run that were not.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: 54% of procurement organisations cite insufficient data quality and integration as the barrier to AI (Hackett, 2026).
All channels
SupplyPulse
Hear the supplier failing before it fails you. Alerts arrive graded to your exposure, not as a flood.
The machine holdsMonitors financial, cyber, geopolitical, sanctions and ESG signals across the base and grades them against open commitments by category.
A named human signsThe CPO signs risk appetite, critical-supplier tiering and any contingency or exit.
The receiptSignal source, exposure by category, grade and reason. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverSupply disruption and sanctions exposure
Runs on: Ariba Supplier Risk, S/4HANA open purchase orders and contracts
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Vendor master, Purchase order receipts) · NetSuite (Vendor Records, Item Receipts) · Oracle Fusion (Supplier Qualification, Procurement analytics) · Workday (Supplier master, Supplier performance)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
One critical-supplier failure caught sixty days early on a £4m category avoids the expedite premium and the line stoppage; a 10% premium avoided is £400,000.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. No benchmark cited: the number that matters is your re-sourcing lead time for each single-source supplier, measured in the Diagnostic; the reference case assumes sixty days of notice.
Strategiccontracted POframework
EventRunner
RFx admin from kickoff to bid tab, handled. The panel discusses the decision, not the spreadsheet, and the award survives a challenge.
The machine holdsAssembles RFx packs from templates, runs supplier Q&A and deadline chasing, produces normalised bid tabulations and scoring sheets.
A named human signsThe sourcing lead signs publication, scores and the award recommendation; the panel owns the award.
The receiptEvent id, template version, normalisation method, score sheet and weights, panel spread. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverSourcing cycle time and defensibility
Runs on: Ariba Sourcing projects and events
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Requests for quotation and replies) · NetSuite (Vendor Bids) · Oracle Fusion (Sourcing negotiations and responses) · Workday (Strategic Sourcing events and bids)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
60 events a year at 3 days of admin each: 180 days returned; source-to-contract cycle 20% shorter brings savings forward by a quarter, worth £250,000 on a £5m pipeline.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: SAP's own 2026 bid-analysis agent targets the same tabulation work; the difference is the signed score sheet and the non-competitive reason captured (SAP News, 2026).
Strategiccontracted PO
CatalogueKeeper
Buy-channel compliance without the policing. Prices audited against contract, repeat buys nudged onto catalogue.
The machine holdsAudits catalogue prices against contracted terms, flags off-catalogue and off-contract buys, proposes catalogue items for anything bought more than twelve times a year.
A named human signsThe category manager signs content changes and standing channel exceptions.
The receiptItem, catalogue price, contract price, variance, requisitions affected. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverPrice creep and transaction cost
Runs on: Ariba catalogues and punch-out, contract terms, S/4HANA info records
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Procurement catalogs, Vendor catalogs) · NetSuite (Items, Vendor price lists) · Oracle Fusion (Self Service Procurement catalogs, Purchasing agreements) · Workday (Supplier catalogs, Punchout)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
£40m catalogue spend with 1.5% price drift caught: £600,000 a year; 10,000 free-text lines moved to catalogue at £90 saved each: £900,000.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. No benchmark cited: the reference case assumes 1.5% price drift on catalogue spend and £90 saved for each free-text line moved to catalogue, both measured in the Diagnostic.
Catalogueguided buyingframeworkP-card
TenderSentinel
Never miss a framework, tender or market signal again. Opportunities arrive with a one-page brief; the category lead decides.
The machine holdsScans tender portals, framework expiries and award notices; files qualified opportunities into the pipeline with a brief.
A named human signsThe category lead signs pipeline entry and market approach.
The receiptSource, category match confidence, related contract, brief. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverPipeline coverage
Runs on: Ariba Discovery and public notices, contract validity dates
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Procurement and sourcing, Requests for quotation) · NetSuite (SuiteProcurement, Vendor Bids) · Oracle Fusion (Sourcing) · Workday (Strategic Sourcing)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
Two additional competitive events a year on £2m categories at 6% saving: £240,000.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: Category strategy and sourcing pipeline are where CPOs report the least tool support (Hackett 2026 study).
Strategiccontracted POframework
IndexWatch
Formula-priced direct materials tracked to landed cost. The price note drafts itself; the category manager signs the number.
The machine holdsTracks commodity index, currency, freight and duty against formula contracts, computes landed cost, drafts price-adjustment notes and flags hedge exposure.
A named human signsThe category manager signs the adjusted price and any source change; the planner signs every call-off the agent drafts, on plan or off plan; Treasury signs hedging; quality signs source qualification.
The receiptMaterial and source, formula and inputs with dates, computed price, volume affected. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverFormula price accuracy and hedge timing
Runs on: S/4HANA purchase contracts, scheduling agreements, info records; Ariba product sourcing
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Trade agreements, Purchase agreements) · NetSuite (Vendor price lists, Purchase Contracts) · Oracle Fusion (Purchasing blanket agreements and price updates) · Workday (Supplier Contracts pricing)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
£60m formula-priced spend, 0.5% recovered through timely adjustment: £300,000 a year.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: Direct-material price formulas are reviewed quarterly by hand in most manufacturers; index moves inside the quarter are absorbed unseen (StoryC direct-materials pattern).
Strategic and direct
Steward
The supplier master kept clean after the purge. Duplicates caught on create, drift caught on patrol, every merge signed by a person.
The machine holdsDedupes on create, patrols the business partner master for drift, proposes merges and families with confidence and source; bank fields excluded.
A named human signsThe steward signs every merge and deletion; the CPO signs the naming convention.
The receiptRecord ids, match evidence, confidence, decision and time. Any override: who, when and why.
The leverEvery other agent's trust
Runs on: S/4HANA business partner and change documents, Ariba SLP
Also on: Dynamics 365 (Vendor master, Vendor bank accounts, Change management) · NetSuite (Vendor Records, Duplicate detection) · Oracle Fusion (Supplier master, Supplier Data Quality) · Workday (Supplier master, Supplier bank details)
Try it with your CPO Buddy, on your own key →
Illustrative return
6,000 suppliers with 12% duplicates: 700 records merged once, then held clean; the value is the twenty other agents switching on a quarter earlier.
illustrative reference case: your numbers in the Diagnostic. Benchmark: Only 11% of CPOs are fully ready for AI; data quality is the cited reason (Hackett 2026).
All channels